
The Uncivilize method is designed to gain clarity, imagine ways for personal and systemic change and explore how to make them real
How do we break free?
The change we need is deep, and all-encompassing. Many of us grew up as consumers in our capitalistic culture. It shaped the way we look at the world. We live and breathe its values, and reinforce them everyday in the way we eat, learn, care, rest, create, and work together.
How can we possibly change a global system, that is so deeply engrained in us?
Where do we even begin? Where do we find the energy, in a system that is designed to exhaust? That makes us believe our only power lies in our role as consumers? And that creates the illusion that we need to solve it all on our own?
Why Uncivilize
We are living through a polycrisis.
Climate change. Biodiversity loss. Pollution. Social fragmentation. Burnout. A quiet but growing sense that, despite all our advances, life is not getting better in the ways that matter.
These crises are usually treated as separate problems, each waiting for its own technical solution. Uncivilize believes they share a common root, and at the heart of it lies distance.
Distance between everyday life and the things that sustain it; food, energy, materials, land, care, community, meaning. What was once close, visible, and shared has been stretched across long chains of production, logistics, finance, and control.
This distance is not accidental. It is a defining feature of what we call Global Mode: industrial society organized around scale, abstraction, and growth.
Uncivilize feels this mode of organizing life has reached its limits, but there are other modes available to us, even when we don't always acknowledge them, to help imagine better ways of being.
Why the story of progress is breaking down
The modern story of progress rests on two foundations.
The first is material: a one-time energy surplus. Fossil fuels gave industrial society access to extraordinary amounts of cheap energy in a very short period of time. This allowed work, production, transport, and coordination to scale far beyond what human and ecological systems could normally support. Expansion felt natural. Growth felt inevitable.
The second is cultural: a worldview shaped by the Enlightenment. Nature became something to exploit. Society and labor something to optimize. Distance, abstraction, and control became markers of advancement.
Together, these forces produced what we now recognize as Global Mode, a way of living that separates production from consumption, decisions from consequences, and value from lived experience.
For decades, the returns were undeniable. More energy and scale produced more food, more goods, longer lives, and unprecedented material comfort.
That dynamic is now reversing.
As resources become harder to extract and ecosystems degrade, each additional layer of energy, infrastructure, and coordination delivers less benefit than the last. More effort is spent maintaining systems than improving life. Costs that were once hidden like; climate damage, pollution, health impacts, biodiversity loss, are becoming unavoidable.
Even if energy were clean, cheap, and abundant, it would still be used to fuel more growth: more production, more systems, more infrastructure, and more coordination. That means more mining, more land use, more geopolitical tension, and more pressure on people to keep up, produce, and consume.
More energy (even green energy) doesn’t remove limits, it accelerates how fast we run into them.
At the same time, decades of wellbeing and public health research show a clear pattern: economic growth improves life up to a point. Beyond that point, its returns on health, satisfaction, and social trust weaken, while environmental and social costs accelerate.
This is not a moral failure. It is a structural one, pointing to something deeper in our systems, not temporary setbacks, but underlying conditions shaping the crises we live in.
Global Mode; industrial society organized around distance and perpetual growth, sits at the root of the polycrisis.
Four modes of living
Steps to consumption
To understand how Modes operates, and why Global Mode today produces diminishing returns, Uncivilize introduces a central concept: steps to consumption.
Steps to consumption describe how many transformations lie between a natural resource and everyday use: material processing, energy input, transport, coordination, finance, regulation, and control.
They also describe how far everyday life is separated from the acts that sustain it.
In Wild Mode, steps approach zero. Consumption is immediate or lightly prepared and the exchange with nature is respectful and reciprocal.
In Domestic Mode, steps increase through cultivation, storage, and preparation, but remain human-scaled and legible.
In Local Mode, steps expand through specialization and trade, yet remain traceable within a place or bioregion.
In Global Mode, steps multiply beyond comprehension. Simple actions depend on vast, opaque systems like global supply-chains, financial markets and artificial intelligence.
Each additional step increases material throughput, but it also increases abstraction. As steps multiply, everyday life becomes further removed from the sources of sustenance, effort, and consequence. Participation gives way to consumption. Understanding to convenience.
As long as energy was cheap and abundant, adding steps produced extraordinary gains. But steps compound. Over time, more energy and effort are required not to improve life, but to sustain complexity itself. Risk grows faster than resilience. Skills are outsourced. Agency thins out.
BUT ENERGY IS NO LONGER CHEAP, RESOURCES ARE FINITE, AND PEOPLE DON'T THRIVE UNDER INCREASING PRESSURE AND POLARIZATION
This is where the idea of civilization begins to invert.
More steps do not automatically produce more wellbeing. While fewer steps mean less energy, fewer materials, and less strain on the living world, fewer steps bring everyday life back into contact with effort, care, and consequence.
Reducing distance is the means. Rebuilding connection is the end.
Three vital spaces
To understand where this inversion takes hold, and where change is possible, Uncivilize distinguishes between three vital spaces: the arenas where life is shaped and power operates.
Inner Space: Your personal notions, stories, beliefs and ideas, the things that define and motivate you.
Living Space: Daily life: homes, tools, habits, skills, rituals, care, social practices.
Environmental Space: The landscapes we inhabit and depend on: ecosystems, neighborhoods, commons, infrastructure, built environments.
System Space: The abstract structures that organize society: finance, law, policy, standards, institutions, cultural norms.
With access to cheap energy (fossil fuels) and the enlightenment mindset, Global Mode came to dominate all three spaces, through four mechanisms:
Indoctrination: by replacing religion with the scientific method (nihilistic worldview) and individualism (is this rooted in the individual/humanitary rights) and later by advertisement, we created a self centered narrative where the individual has 'the right' to happiness that's satisfied by material wealth…
Commodification: In living space, care became a service, food a commodity, skill something outsourced. This commodification has displaced Domestic Mode.
Extraction: In environmental space, land became an asset, ecosystems a resource, extraction the norm. Natural systems in Wild Mode have largely been exhausted.
Industrialization: In system space, growth became the overriding goal shaping rules, investment, and success. The place based economies and businesses in Local Mode could simply not compete.
Other modes were not eliminated, they were pushed to the margins, informalized, or made invisible.
Yet they persist wherever people shorten distance and reclaim participation: in community gardens, neighborhood energy cooperatives, repair cafés, shared workshops, craft revival, and countless everyday practices.